The Chinese government has made no secret of the fact that it wants to
compete with IT and business process outsourcing powerhouse India on the global
outsourcing stage. In 2006, the country's Ministry of Commerce unveiled it's
"1,000-100-10 Project" with aimed to double China's services export by
establishing 10 outsourcing hubs, attracting 100 multinationals to its shores,
and developing 1,000 local vendors capable of meeting the demands of
international customers.
So how's that been going? Very slowly, according to Arie Lewin, director of the Center for International Business Education and Research at Duke University's Fuqua School of Business.
The country's IT and business process services industry, which Lewin conservatively estimates is worth about $50 billion today, has seen little growth in recent years. "China has a national goal to build up this industry as new lever of economic development and this idea that they could leapfrog India," says Lewin. "But progress has been very slow."
Chalk part of it up to bad timing. "They're trying to get into an industry whose growth rate has leveled off, and it's tough to take market share away from anybody," says Lewin.
China's Services Providers Need Better Talent and Security to Compete
More fundamentally, providers in China face two other impediments: talent problems and a terrible reputation for intellectual property protection and security. Few Chinese professionals see business services as a viable career path. Providers who want to attract the best and brightest often pay a 20 percent premium on salaries, says Lewin, and there's already little labor arbitrage to be had in cities like Shanghai.
Lack of training in project management and process leaves many companies stuck doing low level work. And lack of English proficiency excludes most players from the lucrative outbound call center business.
Then there's the IP problem. Rightly or wrongly, Chinese service providers suffer "the negative consequences of organizations in China that are bombarding Western corporate Web sites and violating intellectual property," says Lewin. "Companies are not giving providers work because of this insecurity." One U.S.-based provider is spending $3 million a year to maintain its firewalls, Lewin says. "If that's what has to happen, it's unreasonable."
How Chinese Service Providers View Their Position
To find out more about how providers view the situation, Lewin along with Shanghai Jiao Tong University professor Liu Yi recently surveyed 250 providers in China, 71 percent of whom are headquartered there. What they found was a universe of undersized, young companies struggling to compete for international business.
Small providers (fewer than 500 employees) account for 87 percent of the market, according to the survey; and 79 percent of the providers had been in business for less than ten years. Just 22 percent of respondents said they had implemented Six Sigma principles, while 60 percent reported implementation of some ISO standards.
When asked about the top new services they planned to offer, 24 percent indicated software development with 12 percent answering IT infrastructure support and product design. The majority of providers also said they expected new work to more likely come from China and Asia than Europe or the U.S.
"One of the most telling themes was that, in the future, they want to focus more on the domestic industry than international clients. They realize they're not at the level of professionalism that makes them competitive for international business," Lewin says. "They're not ready to leapfrog India." That's a downshift from the more aspirational attitudes Lewin says he had seen in recent years.
Since 2006, the Chinese government has altered its approach to bolstering its services industry, identifying more than 20 cities that might be able to develop a good model that could be used throughout the country. "The approach is very Chinese," Lewin says.
But Lewin has some other suggestions for the government, such as creating incentives for ISO standards compliance. That would send a clear message about the importance of process to the business. "China doesn't have a process orientation the way India or Germany or Japan does," Lewin says. "In China, if they find a shortcut they will take it, and they will not document it. I hear it all the time."
The U.S. mid-market could also be a growth opportunity for Chinese companies, but trying to sell internationally is prohibitively expensive for small players. The Chinese government "could create representative offices in the U.S. and reduce the marketing costs for them," says Lewin.
So how's that been going? Very slowly, according to Arie Lewin, director of the Center for International Business Education and Research at Duke University's Fuqua School of Business.
The country's IT and business process services industry, which Lewin conservatively estimates is worth about $50 billion today, has seen little growth in recent years. "China has a national goal to build up this industry as new lever of economic development and this idea that they could leapfrog India," says Lewin. "But progress has been very slow."
Chalk part of it up to bad timing. "They're trying to get into an industry whose growth rate has leveled off, and it's tough to take market share away from anybody," says Lewin.
China's Services Providers Need Better Talent and Security to Compete
More fundamentally, providers in China face two other impediments: talent problems and a terrible reputation for intellectual property protection and security. Few Chinese professionals see business services as a viable career path. Providers who want to attract the best and brightest often pay a 20 percent premium on salaries, says Lewin, and there's already little labor arbitrage to be had in cities like Shanghai.
Lack of training in project management and process leaves many companies stuck doing low level work. And lack of English proficiency excludes most players from the lucrative outbound call center business.
Then there's the IP problem. Rightly or wrongly, Chinese service providers suffer "the negative consequences of organizations in China that are bombarding Western corporate Web sites and violating intellectual property," says Lewin. "Companies are not giving providers work because of this insecurity." One U.S.-based provider is spending $3 million a year to maintain its firewalls, Lewin says. "If that's what has to happen, it's unreasonable."
How Chinese Service Providers View Their Position
To find out more about how providers view the situation, Lewin along with Shanghai Jiao Tong University professor Liu Yi recently surveyed 250 providers in China, 71 percent of whom are headquartered there. What they found was a universe of undersized, young companies struggling to compete for international business.
Small providers (fewer than 500 employees) account for 87 percent of the market, according to the survey; and 79 percent of the providers had been in business for less than ten years. Just 22 percent of respondents said they had implemented Six Sigma principles, while 60 percent reported implementation of some ISO standards.
When asked about the top new services they planned to offer, 24 percent indicated software development with 12 percent answering IT infrastructure support and product design. The majority of providers also said they expected new work to more likely come from China and Asia than Europe or the U.S.
"One of the most telling themes was that, in the future, they want to focus more on the domestic industry than international clients. They realize they're not at the level of professionalism that makes them competitive for international business," Lewin says. "They're not ready to leapfrog India." That's a downshift from the more aspirational attitudes Lewin says he had seen in recent years.
Since 2006, the Chinese government has altered its approach to bolstering its services industry, identifying more than 20 cities that might be able to develop a good model that could be used throughout the country. "The approach is very Chinese," Lewin says.
But Lewin has some other suggestions for the government, such as creating incentives for ISO standards compliance. That would send a clear message about the importance of process to the business. "China doesn't have a process orientation the way India or Germany or Japan does," Lewin says. "In China, if they find a shortcut they will take it, and they will not document it. I hear it all the time."
The U.S. mid-market could also be a growth opportunity for Chinese companies, but trying to sell internationally is prohibitively expensive for small players. The Chinese government "could create representative offices in the U.S. and reduce the marketing costs for them," says Lewin.
No comments:
Post a Comment